Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 05:30

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
This Device Pulls Clean Drinking Water Out of the Air - VICE
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Can you turn 150 pages into a 5 minute presentation before a meeting?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thousands of galaxies revealed in a single Webb image - Earth.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Credo Stock Rockets On 'Impressive' Beat-And-Raise Earnings Report - Investor's Business Daily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud - NBC News
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Lowering Blood Pressure May Cut Dementia Risk by Up to 15% - Neuroscience News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Phage therapy: I found a bacteria-eating virus in my loo - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?